Sunday, April 17, 2011

Hamlet's "To Be Or Not To Be..."

       In the first video, Mel Gibson portrays Hamlet and says the "To Be Or Not To Be.." speech as he walks down into a dark, dreary basement. A creepy feeling comes over you as you see the skulls and statues of corpses in the basement as he walks around. Hamlet seems dreary himself and speaks in a low voice but then begins to get louder and angry in the middle of the speech. It is clear that Hamlet is in a bad state of mind and he begins to talk to one of the statues of a dead person. This makes the viewers realize that he is deciding whether to live or not to live which has been a major battle within himself. He is suffering from depression and being in this dark, scary basement is not helping him get any better but he does decide not to kill himself for the sole reason that he is not sure if death could be worse than his life is at the current moment.
      Hamlets internal struggle to live or not to live is also shown in Lawrence Oliver's version of Hamlet's "To Be Or Not To Be.." speech. This version appears in black and white and is even creepier than Mel Gibson's version in the beginning. Unlike Mel Gibson's Hamlet who says the entire speech outloud, Lawrence Oliver subconsciously says part of the speech as he pulls a knife out of his shirt and moves it toward his neck. Lawrence is also sitting on a high cliff above the ocean where he could jump off of and kill himself. Here there are two obvious attempts to kill himself where in Mel Gibson's version he does not show any attempt at all. You have to look deeper into Mel Gibson's version to understand his internal battle to kill himself or stay alive.
     Kenneth Branaugh's version of the "To Be Or Not To Be.." speech does not really compare to either of the other speeches because it is clearly not serious. This version had a strange feeling to it but I did not get a creepy or dark feeling from it at all. Kenneth Branaugh walks into a bright, colorful room in a mansion and looks into a mirror. He recites the speech to the reflection of himself unlike Mel Gibson who is speaking to statues and skulls. It is hard to see the fight between life and death in this character because he never seems to be completely serious throughout the speech. It is almost comical when he pulls his weapon out of his shirt like Lawrence Oliver did because it is a  puny knife that doesn't even look sharp enough to do any damage. The best portrayal of Hamlet's struggle between life and death is shown in Mel Gibson's version. Although you may have to look deeper into this version, it had the darkest feel to it with all of the skulls and statues and he showed the most emotion.

4 comments:

  1. Erin,

    You make keen observations regarding the real life-and-death danger of Olivier's version.

    In order to make this more reader-friendly, I recommend seperating your ideas into paragraphs, switching to a more standard font, and writing more efficiently.

    ReplyDelete
  2. These three versions of "To Be Or Not To Be..." are completely different from each other and you did a very good job at explaining how. I agree that Mel Gibson's version is the "best portrayal of Hamlet's struggle between life and death." I also agree that in order to fully understand Gibson's version you must look deeper into the actual words that are coming out of his mouth. In Oliver's version I was unable to recongize the battle between life vs. death; I just assumed that he was going to kill himself at that time and place. In this version the viewer is unable to see the deeper meaning that Shakspeare is trying to convey. While watching Branaugh's version I got a smiliar, strange feeling. It was very odd, and I felt as if it had no relation to Shakespeare's Hamlet. It definitely did not capture the terriable struggle that Hamlet goes through.

    ReplyDelete
  3. After reading your blog and comparing it to mine, I see points that you made about mine and how you have a good point. After reading how you explained the obviousness of Hamlet's internal battle in Lawerence Olivier's version I can see where you're coming from. I guess since Mr. Carty explained the Mel Gibson version to us it was easier to make the connection. Anyway, I completely agree with everything you said about Branaugh's version of Hamlet's speech. I couldn't take it seriously either and it all has to do with the setting of the scene. Branaugh almost doesn't seem serious like the play is supposed to be. Neither of us really felt "struggle" in that version.

    ReplyDelete
  4. After comparing and contrasting to some of the other posts I read, I noticed that you gave very in depth perceptions of each of the speeches. I think the one thing that everyone missed in the Kenneth Branaugh version, including myself until someone pointed it out to me, is that the Branaugh version is not only a very literal version...it is supposed to be a drastic comparison. Shakespeare portrays Hamlet to be very depressed and like he has nothing left. After all the speech is about suicide. But the more I thought about it, I realized that the Kenneth Branaugh version was using juxtaposition. You see Branaugh delivering such a serious and depressing speech, in a checkered almost, mansion like place. He is in a suit, and looks wealthy. It's two completely different things.

    ReplyDelete